The television turns around a paradigm very peculiar call Rating, a sovereign whose lacayos succumb before their power, surrenders tribute to him and on him it depends that a certain program, seriado or soap opera survives in the small screen.

The Rating becomes the true headache of many producers, directors, actors, who see irremediably as their programs die prematurely or on the contrary with approval they are witnesses of the welcome, sometimes unexpected of such.

One says that the Rating is the voice of the hearing, in you complete that that decides it sees in the television and since I always implement myself has been questioned like a source little trustworthy and moved away of the reality.

That a program has a high Rating does not imply that it is of good quality, in many occasions the quality does not agree with the rating and paradoxicalally cases difficult occur to assimilate. Considering that the hearing has learned to discern and to criticize the televising product that consumes, is presumed that for want of alternatives it chooses “the best thing of the worse thing”.

Every year all the channels have prepared their heavy artillery, and tend to keep hermetism on some from their productions.  In this battle by the Rating, in which the quality is often not implied and the preferences of the viewers are so dissimilar and varied the last word has not been written, there will always be surprises and will continue applying those sayings that say: “Between tastes, there are no misfortunes”, and “the viewer always is the right”.